OpenAI has set out its approach to teen safety on ChatGPT, arguing that keeping under-18s away from AI until adulthood would leave them badly prepared for a defining technology of their generation.

In a blog post published on 16 July, the company said nearly nine in ten teens using ChatGPT do so weekly for learning, information, skill-building or productivity. Its safety framework rests on four commitments: prioritising teen safety even where it conflicts with other goals, encouraging real-world support, treating teens as teens rather than adults, and being transparent about expectations.

The company automatically detects likely under-18 users and applies extra protections designed to limit exposure to violent, self-harming or body-image content, viral challenges, and inappropriate roleplay scenarios. Parents can now activate Study Mode remotely via Parental Controls, and will receive notifications if a linked teen account is deactivated for violent threats or acts of violence, alongside existing self-harm alerts.

On the learning side, OpenAI said 18 million weekly users now engage with its interactive maths and science tools, covering more than 250 topics from integrals to photosynthesis, while a pronunciation feature now supports over 61 languages.

OpenAI has joined the Family Online Safety Institute this year as part of a wider push involving the American Psychological Association, the American Federation of Teachers and Common Sense Media.

AI & UK GDPR: What Leaders Get Wrong About Data Protection and AI Risk
Is your AI deployment actually a GDPR problem — or are you solving the wrong issue? Most leaders either over-panic about AI and data protection, or ignore it entirely. Craig Clark, Director of Clark and Company Information Governance Services and a practising CISO, cuts through the noise: AI only becomes a UK GDPR issue when personal data is involved — but when it is, the risks are serious and often misunderstood. Speakers: Craig Clark, Director at Clark and Company Information Governance Services; Stewart Tinson, Projecgt Director, AI-360. You’ll learn: - Why AI is not automatically a GDPR issue — and the one question that determines whether it is - Why consent is not the most important lawful basis, and which lawful basis actually fits AI use cases - Why a global firm’s AI agent hallucinated its entire sales strategy throughout 2026 — and what human oversight would have prevented it - How to approach DPIAs as a design tool, not a compliance tick-box - Why facial recognition bias disproportionately harms people who are not middle-aged white men - What to actually ask AI vendors regarding data usage and sharing Key topics: UK GDPR & AI • Lawful basis for AI • Special category data • DPIAs • Transparency obligations • Human in the loop • AI supplier due diligence • Facial recognition bias • Data minimisation • Security non-negotiables Essential viewing for CISOs, CIOs, legal, and compliance leaders deploying AI in data-sensitive environments.
Share this post
The link has been copied!